Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:45:09 +0100 From: Clement Laforet <clement@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: clement@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache-2.0.52_2 port is broken ?!! Message-ID: <20041031114509.37a4d578.clement@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20041031092320.GA74401@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <BAY2-DAV10Px33E1ioW0001fd36@hotmail.com> <20041031092320.GA74401@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Sun__31_Oct_2004_11_45_09_+0100_eZ=t17b4.DegLgo/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 09:23:20 +0000 Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > Looks like the maintainer (CC'd) left some stuff commented out in the > port Makefile which should have been uncommented. don't ask why :-) > --- Makefile.orig Sun Oct 31 09:13:29 2004 > +++ Makefile Sat Oct 30 21:54:36 2004 <snip patch> > This does cause the configure step to generate a number of warnings, > but otherwise compilation proceeds as normal. I shouldn't have commit Makefile changes, it was only for testing purpose. I've just committed a fix. Sorry for the noise guys ! clem --Signature=_Sun__31_Oct_2004_11_45_09_+0100_eZ=t17b4.DegLgo/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBhMI1sRhfjwcjuh0RAp8QAJ9PGLz/d08XJqxOQX9Wj1BKBPoW+QCfWeQ0 pTm7asbKF2MrYDXNP3jiILY= =9E1O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__31_Oct_2004_11_45_09_+0100_eZ=t17b4.DegLgo/--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041031114509.37a4d578.clement>