Date: Tue, 9 Jan 1996 13:31:54 +0100 (MET) From: Thomas Graichen <graichen@omega.physik.fu-berlin.de> To: chuckr@glue.umd.edu (Chuck Robey) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc v2.7.2 and libg++ v2.7.1 Message-ID: <199601091231.NAA22248@dirac.physik.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960108131434.1360H-100000@espresso.eng.umd.edu> from "Chuck Robey" at Jan 8, 96 01:16:32 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hasn't Chuck Robey said ? ...
>
> If you have access to a corrected freebsd.h, could you maybe post the diffs?
> If you did that, and I used Doug Rabson's libg++ bmake post, I could then
> build a complete gcc-2.7.2/libg++-2.7.1 environment, right?
>
the problem is that i don't have a full set of patches - i only know the of
WEAK problem (which i sent to the FSF too) and know that there are more
patches are floating around (ask bruce evans - he posted a list of patches
here some time ago) - and this is the reason why i wan't to have all the
required patches in the FSF release - so that i don't have to look for all the
patches floating around (only half of which i know of :-) - we may also go a
step further - like NetBSD to integrate the libexec paths there too as an
#ifdef (take a look at the netbsd.h file - i think that's the name - it's
directly in the config dir - not in the i386 subdir i think)
t
_______________________________________________________||___________________
__||
Perfection is reached, not when there is no __|| thomas graichen
longer anything to add, but when there __|| freie universitaet berlin
is no longer anything to take away __|| fachbereich physik
__||
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery - __|| graichen@mail.physik.fu-berlin.de
___________________________||__________________graichen@FreeBSD.org_________
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601091231.NAA22248>