Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 14:36:32 -0600 From: Duke Normandin <01031149@3web.net> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvsup RELENG_4 = 4.4-RC1 ? Message-ID: <20010825143631.B257941@mandy.rockingd.calgary.ab.ca> In-Reply-To: <20010825181134.E559@ringworld.oblivion.bg>; from "Peter Pentchev" on Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 06:11:34PM References: <20010825175631.C559@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <XFMail.20010825100718.conrads@home.com> <20010825181134.E559@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 06:11:34PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > Well, RELENG_4 is still technically - or might be considered ;) - > 4.x-STABLE, although 4.4-RC is a better description. > > So yes, I guess you're right - the 4.4-RC1 snapshot of the 4.4-RC > period of the RELENG_4 branch (whee..) is a better choice than > any snapshot of the 4.3-STABLE period of the RELENG_4 branch.. > > Okay, I'll shut up now :) Not yet! ;^) RELEASE; STABLE; CURRENT are intuitive and easily understood. What do RELENG and RC means? Roman Catholic version? RELease ENGlish version? I find it difficult to draw a parallel between these last two and the other three above, as I suspect a lot of others do. L8r.. -- duke Calgary, Alberta, Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010825143631.B257941>