From owner-freebsd-chat  Mon Mar  3 17:23:55 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA14335
          for chat-outgoing; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 17:23:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA14330
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 17:23:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from henrich@localhost)
          by crh.cl.msu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id UAA00592; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 20:23:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Message-Id: <199703040123.UAA00592@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge)
To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty)
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 20:23:42 -0500 (EST)
Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199703040121.RAA10012@rah.star-gate.com> from Amancio Hasty at "Mar 3, 97 05:21:50 pm"
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I see that the "Eye" is popping in unusual places 8)

;)  Ayup! :)

> Yeah, it bugs that we can't seem to break the 400k barrier , argh...

Damn annoying.  Although genx claims the next client is much faster on intel
and alpha platforms, so we should be able to vault over it, if they are
correct.

-Crh

       Charles Henrich     Michigan State University     henrich@msu.edu

                         http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich