Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 23:27:23 -0700 From: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.org> To: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net>, doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Application and command names in <title> elements Message-ID: <20030520232723.C8403@freebsdmall.com> In-Reply-To: <20030520214445.GA92534@submonkey.net>; from setantae@submonkey.net on Tue, May 20, 2003 at 10:44:45PM %2B0100 References: <20030519192255.GB74434@submonkey.net> <20030520214445.GA92534@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 10:44:45PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:22:55PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > I've been taking a high level look at getting all the <title> elements in
> > the handbook ready for the 3rd edition (well, glimpse has been doing all
> > the hard work so far), and I'm very tempted to religiously wrap all application
> > and command names in the appropriate markup.
I think that is a good idea. We talked of doing this during the 2nd
edition work but I'm not sure if we never got around to it, or if we
made a sweep but now things have slowly drifted back or what. In any
case, it's a good thing from a high level perspective because "super
XML-tools and search engines yet to be written" can give better
results with more descriptive title names.
As long as it's not a big aesthetic step backwards in the mean time,
I'm all for it. And even if it is a big aesthetic step backwards, we
can easily ignore the offending tags when enclosed in <title> via
freebsd.dsl.
- Murray
--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQE+yxxLtNcQog5FH30RAiepAJ9TjSmYSA8fr2hVnDWI88kDsNKVoACfc+vZ
dI2X/42D3gTtp6DMZkUbPlU=
=AcJM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030520232723.C8403>