From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 14:32:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9702316A4CE; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:32:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from praetor.linc-it.com (adsl-068-157-070-217.sip.jan.bellsouth.net [68.157.70.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6602543D41; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:31:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mortis.over-yonder.net (adsl-19-157-169.jan.bellsouth.net [68.19.157.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by praetor.linc-it.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046CE15518; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:31:30 -0600 (CST) Received: by mortis.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3B89720F2F; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:31:20 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:31:19 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Joe Marcus Clarke Message-ID: <20040108223119.GO48603@over-yonder.net> References: <1073599686.752.62.camel@gyros> <20040108221340.GY8322@submonkey.net> <1073600861.752.65.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1073600861.752.65.camel@gyros> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i-fullermd.1 X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD cc: Ceri Davies cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PLEASE REVIEW: MAINTAINER policy addendum to porters-handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 22:32:01 -0000 On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:27:41PM -0500 I heard the voice of Joe Marcus Clarke, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > > > + If the maintainer of a port does not respond to a an update > > > + request from a user after two weeks (excluding holidays), then > > > > I wouldn't normally be picky, but this is a policy definition. > > You're absolutely right. Do you have a suggestion on how this can be > clarified? Thanks. How about something like "after two weeks (taking common holidays into account)"? -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ "The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is because I haven't figured out how to light the middle yet"