From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct  2 23:37:41 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5812E16A4CE
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 Oct 2004 23:37:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from duchess.speedfactory.net (duchess.speedfactory.net
	[66.23.201.84])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D465C43D1F
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 Oct 2004 23:37:40 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ups@tree.com)
Received: (qmail 26509 invoked by uid 89); 2 Oct 2004 23:37:39 -0000
Received: from duchess.speedfactory.net (66.23.201.84)
  by duchess.speedfactory.net with SMTP; 2 Oct 2004 23:37:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 26487 invoked by uid 89); 2 Oct 2004 23:37:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO palm.tree.com) (66.23.216.49)
  by duchess.speedfactory.net with SMTP; 2 Oct 2004 23:37:39 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.tree.com [127.0.0.1])
	by palm.tree.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i92Nbcmt034963;
	Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:37:38 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from ups@tree.com)
From: Stephan Uphoff <ups@tree.com>
To: Peter Holm <peter@holm.cc>
In-Reply-To: <20041002183120.GA1202@peter.osted.lan>
References: <1096489576.3733.1868.camel@palm.tree.com>
	<200409291652.29990.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
	<1096496057.3733.2163.camel@palm.tree.com>
	<1096603981.21577.195.camel@palm.tree.com>
	<1096608201.21577.203.camel@palm.tree.com>
	<20041001141040.GA1556@peter.osted.lan>
	<1096647194.27811.12.camel@palm.tree.com>
	<20041001192551.GA3381@peter.osted.lan>
	<415EEFFE.5080309@elischer.org>
	<20041002183120.GA1202@peter.osted.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1096760257.34527.14.camel@palm.tree.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 19:37:37 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: scheduler (sched_4bsd) questions
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 23:37:41 -0000

On Sat, 2004-10-02 at 14:31, Peter Holm wrote:
> OK, right now I'm testing with all of Stephan's patches + the 
> MUTEX_WAKE_ALL flag. Uptime is 3 3/4 hour and looking good.

Great.

Your attached diff contained all the fixes needed and I don't see the
need to post a cumulative patch. 

The only thing left to do is migrate a critical sections from
kern_mutex.c to subr_turnstile.c for readability. 
(no functional changes)

Maybe it would also better to just force  MUTEX_WAKE_ALL in
kern_mutex.c (#ifndef MUTEX_WAKE_ALL \n#define MUTEX_WAKE_ALL\n#endif)
to avoid temporary configuration file pollution?

	Stephan