From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 26 00:10:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B63D16A4DE; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from devon.odell@coyotepoint.com) Received: from mail11.simplicato.com (host70.simplicato.com [207.99.47.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A412C43D53; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:10:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from devon.odell@coyotepoint.com) Received: from mail11.simplicato.com (localhost.simplicato.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail11.simplicato.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64428D47B7B; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:10:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.0.0.13] (dcha-205-231-27-066.taconic.net [205.231.27.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail11.simplicato.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7DED47AF4; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:10:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44EF918C.1010600@coyotepoint.com> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:10:52 -0400 From: "Devon H. O'Dell" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Rhodes References: <44EF355D.5050208@coyotepoint.com> <1156532704.8612.2.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20060825195110.450a1a7b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20060825195110.450a1a7b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: pav@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fix for ithread.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:10:56 -0000 Tom Rhodes wrote: > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:05:04 +0200 > Pav Lucistnik wrote: > >> Devon H. O'Dell píše v pá 25. 08. 2006 v 13:37 -0400: >> >>> I was discussing UMA with Robert Watson yesterday; specifically its >>> usage implications in an interrupt context. He suggested adding some >>> information to ithread(9) specifying semantics for memory allocation in >>> an interrupt context. So I came up with this tiny patch, shot it jhb@'s >>> way, he reviewed it and told me to shoot it this way. >>> >>> So here it is, apparently ready to be committed. >> Applied, thanks! > > After you fixed the hard sentence break issue, right Pav? ;) ? I don't see a hard sentence break in my patch or the commit. --dho