From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 22 10:02:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A251106566B for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:02:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4690D8FC0C for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:02:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QkCYn-0002TJ-VO for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:02:21 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:02:21 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:02:21 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:02:10 +0200 Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <20110721215617.7C7F0B827@mail.bitblocks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: <20110721215617.7C7F0B827@mail.bitblocks.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: OS X Lion time machine => (afpd|iSCSI) => ZFS question X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:02:23 -0000 On 21/07/2011 23:56, Bakul Shah wrote: > I got wondering if iSCSI on > FreeBSD is stable enough for time machine use. How much duct > tape and baling wire are needed to make it work?! iSCSI as in the target (server) function? net/istgt in ports seemed ok last time I tried it.