From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 3 11:39:24 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id LAA25700 for current-outgoing; Sun, 3 Sep 1995 11:39:24 -0700 Received: from grunt.grondar.za (grunt.grondar.za [196.7.18.129]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA25694 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 1995 11:39:00 -0700 Received: from grumble.grondar.za (grumble.grondar.za [196.7.18.130]) by grunt.grondar.za (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA00315; Sun, 3 Sep 1995 20:38:10 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grumble.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA14128; Sun, 3 Sep 1995 20:38:09 +0200 Message-Id: <199509031838.UAA14128@grumble.grondar.za> X-Authentication-Warning: grumble.grondar.za: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: current@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: lynx in /usr/src/usr.bin/lynx; any objections? Date: Sun, 03 Sep 1995 20:38:09 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Either that or we could convert all of our GNU info files to SGML > files and keep just one type of docs reader around, but I don't know > what the current state of the art in info->SGML translation technology > is so I can't really comment on the viability of this option. > > However, I'll not bring any of this in until the "anti-bloatists" have > had a chance to comment. > > Any strong objections? Any strong agreement? Please count me in for `strong agreement'. I would also strongly agree if the browser was not lynx, but some other text browser. We need this badly... M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 Finger mark@grumble.grondar.za for PGP key