Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 May 2020 17:10:39 +0200
From:      Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@freebsd.org>, Hiroki Tagato <tagattie@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, koobs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r535526 - in head: . sysutils sysutils/py-rdiff-backup sysutils/py-rdiff-backup/files sysutils/rdiff-backup
Message-ID:  <20200520171039.680fd46e6d1180796c50042d@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200520150415.yn3cc6ebghlf6bpt@aching.in.mat.cc>
References:  <202005170835.04H8ZKws029186@repo.freebsd.org> <20200520143655.rvvwajvklbkzyvdz@aching.in.mat.cc> <20200520165905.114abeca25f06c90b71f3945@FreeBSD.org> <20200520150415.yn3cc6ebghlf6bpt@aching.in.mat.cc>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:59:05PM +0200, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> > Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 08:35:20AM +0000, Hiroki Tagato wrote:
> > > >   - Rename portname to py-rdiff-backup following Python Ports
> > > > Policy[1]
> > > 
> > > This feels like a very bad idea, for more than one reason.
> > 
> > This was reviewed in (you subscribed too):
> > 
> > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24816
> > 
> > > - This renamed the package, so once again, it left users running
> > > pkg upgrade with an outdated version.  Unless they notice it and
> > > figure out what the new name of the port is.
> > > - This looks like a end user tool, so, people will want to install
> > >   rdiff-backup, not pyxy-rdiff-backup.
> > > 
> > > All in all, I think the rename should be backed out.
> > 
> > koobs reasoning made sense to me but I don't mind renaming the port
> > again if there is a final consensus.
> 
> I don't know the reasoning, but anything that 1) breaks the normal
> upgrade path, and 2) makes it non trivial to figure out the name of
> the package, must have a flaw somewhere.

The detailed reasoning is in the review, search for "On naming (py- or
not)"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200520171039.680fd46e6d1180796c50042d>