From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Wed May 6 08:32:34 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B164C13B33B; Wed, 6 May 2020 08:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49H8wf48Wsz4KWV; Wed, 6 May 2020 08:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 66084161E5; Wed, 6 May 2020 08:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 08:32:34 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Antoine Brodin Cc: Ulrich Sp??rlein , Rene Ladan , ports-committers , svn-ports-all , svn-ports-head Subject: Re: svn commit: r534093 - in head: . audio audio/festvox-czech audio/gkrellmvolume2 audio/mixmos audio/mma audio/pd-cyclone audio/shorten audio/taglib-sharp audio/xhippo biology biology/consed biology/... Message-ID: <20200506083234.GA64535@FreeBSD.org> References: <202005051538.045FcC5t083716@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 08:32:34 -0000 On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 10:14:52AM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 9:17 AM Ulrich Sp??rlein wrote: > > > > This is premature and wrong and should likely be reverted. It removed > > a bunch of ports that are happily building for me. I only found out as > > poudriere complained > > This will not be reverted, no one has used those ports in the last 6 > months. The ports tree is not an abandonware museum. However, this does not change the fact that it was premature and wrong. At least those BROKEN ports should've been build-tested again prior to their removal. ./danfe