Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 14:44:17 -0500 (EST) From: Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com> To: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> Cc: Chris Stenton <jacs@gnome.co.uk>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: old version of PAM in 3.0-stable stopping Samba working? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901261443310.16276-100000@megaweapon.zigg.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901261258110.6851-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry. I jumped to an unfounded conclusion. Actually, I read your message, John, shortly after mine, and oopsed privately. Now I can oops publicly. On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, John Fieber wrote: : On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Matt Behrens wrote: : : > It looks to me that PAM isn't quite "Linux-compatible", and Samba : > was definitely written for Linux PAM. : : How so? It looked to me like the original poster was just trying : to use pam modules for a services they don't implement: : : > : samba account requisite pam_cleartext_pass_ok.so : > : samba account required pam_unix.so try_first_pass : : That doesn't mean the library is broken or incompatible, just : that our modules are different. (And as I said, somewhat : minimalist at this point in time.) - Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com> Network Administrator, zigg.com <http://www.zigg.com/>; Engineer, Nameless IRC Network <http://www.nameless.net/>; To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9901261443310.16276-100000>