From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 10 3:10:47 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6E537B401; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 03:10:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from energyhq.homeip.net (213-97-200-73.uc.nombres.ttd.es [213.97.200.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CB243F75; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 03:10:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from flynn@energyhq.homeip.net) Received: from christine.energyhq.tk (christine.energyhq.tk [192.168.0.1]) by energyhq.homeip.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 76234AF5C5; Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:10:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:10:10 +0100 From: Miguel Mendez To: "clemens fischer" Cc: wes@softweyr.com, nick@garage.freebsd.pl, keramida@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, zaks@prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl Subject: Re: Missing commit bit [PATCH]. Message-Id: <20030210121010.034601cf.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <65rsxutb.fsf@ID-23066.news.dfncis.de> References: <20030204094840.E1A083ABB3B@milla.ask33.net> <20030205195309.GA71510@garage.freebsd.pl> <200302091323.35681.wes@softweyr.com> <65rsxutb.fsf@ID-23066.news.dfncis.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386--netbsdelf) X-Face: 1j}k*2E>Y\+C~E|/wehi[:dCM,{N7/uE 3o# P,{t7gA/qnovFDDuyQV.1hdT7&#d)q"xY33}{_GS>kk'S{O]nE$A`T|\4&p\&mQyexOLb8}FO List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --=.HD60j?y4wWqCq( Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10 Feb 2003 12:02:24 +0100 "clemens fischer" wrote: Howdy, > sorry to insist, but even after following all the links in the > slashdot-story this isn't clear to me. was it really about the > ipfw-hack he proposed? there were eight (or so) emails cited from a > developers list, which looked quite civil to me. it seemed a > technical discussion with the "new-kernel <-> old libs" problem at > its heart, certainly no "dirty linen" there. Slashdot as a source of information, heh :) No, it wasn't about the ipfw thing. As stated several times in the chat@ mailing list, it has to do with 4 years of bad netiquette. It looks like Matt won't and is not willing to change his behavior towards fellow committers. Too bad? Yes, it's a shame. Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez - flynn@energyhq.homeip.net GPG Public Key :: http://energyhq.homeip.net/files/pubkey.txt EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk Of course it runs NetBSD! --=.HD60j?y4wWqCq( Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD) iD8DBQE+R4iWnLctrNyFFPERArSDAKCHsvdOLx+/lWbIN6t9r1Il6JP98gCfSTvC QrAchI3Yg15bygTWsNkDP9E= =pRsK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.HD60j?y4wWqCq(-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message