From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 09:23:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DDF16A4CF; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:23:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D852C43D45; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:23:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) i7V9NWaI017214 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:23:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7V9Mksu088153 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:22:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7V9Mj5U055134; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:22:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7V9Mgq5055133; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:22:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:22:42 +0200 From: Bernd Walter To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20040831092241.GS59909@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <50860.1093874782@critter.freebsd.dk> <200408301056.03499.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408301056.03499.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on cicely5.cicely.de cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: alpha@FreeBSD.org cc: ticso@cicely.de cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 5.3 beta1 is no go for me. X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:23:43 -0000 On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 10:56:02AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 30 August 2004 10:06 am, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <20040830122945.GL59909@cicely12.cicely.de>, Bernd Walter > > writes: > > > > It does boot the 5.0-RC1 CD I have lying around: > > I "fixed" the eisa code to actually include eisaconf.c on Alpha in between 5.1 > and 5.2 I think, so the problem is likely in the eisa code rather than the > PCI bus numbering. I know the EISA addition very well - I don't think anyone ever had been running an AS1000A since that. But after reducing the probed slot numbers Poul gets over the EISA part and there's no other point where EISA by itself should have influences. On the other hand we are tracking 13 month of -current development. Not unlikely that unrelated things have changed that broke this platform - don't you think that holes in PCI numbering could be special to that platform and there were enough PCI and bus changes in the last 13 month? I can only judge the situation from the boot output and what might come next - more guessing right now than anything else. That includes probing pci2 and isa, but not eisa. Does anyone know how to find out which code triggered the trap, whithout spreading printf? I'm not very familar with SRM debugging features. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de