From owner-freebsd-multimedia Mon Nov 27 9:25:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D80637B479 for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 09:25:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eARHP9h51030; Mon, 27 Nov 2000 09:25:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: Steve Reid Cc: Vallo Kallaste , freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XF86-4, Linux binaries, DRI? In-Reply-To: Message from Steve Reid of "Sun, 26 Nov 2000 20:59:15 PST." <20001126205915.A40068@grok> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 09:25:09 -0800 Message-ID: <51028.975345909@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > - With the "normal" graphics setting, my new config (G450/DRI) is > lots slower than my old config (G200/Utah). It's okay at other settings > (vertex lighting & low geometric detail), but the graphics seem jerky > even when the on-screen FPS counter (/cg_drawfps 1) shows over 80 fps. This appears to be an artifact of the degree to which Utah-glx is 'tuned' for the Matrox card. Using a benchmark of a standard G400 with both XFree86 3.3.6 + Utah and XFree86 4.0.1 + DRI + AGP (preloading all the requisite modules), it's a sad fact that 4.0.1 is less than half the speed using all the various xlock/glclock/glracer type benchmarks. I'm sticking with 3.3.6 for now. ;) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message