From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Jun  5 10:23:40 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4F4FA37BFEE; Mon,  5 Jun 2000 10:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from will@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from will@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id KAA59411;
	Mon, 5 Jun 2000 10:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from will@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 10:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: <will@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200006051723.KAA59411@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: bero@ms-windows-2000.com, will@FreeBSD.org, taoka@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/13887: New port (fmirror)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: New port (fmirror)

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: will
State-Changed-When: Mon Jun 5 10:19:14 PDT 2000
State-Changed-Why: 
The originator never replied to TAOKA-san's request.  After
doing a little research, I'm wondering whether this should
be added to the ports tree in the first place, since the newest
tarball on the master site is dated August 5, 1998.  Do you
know where there is a newer tarball?  If not, I'm going to
close this PR and not add the port.


Responsible-Changed-From-To: taoka->freebsd-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: will
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jun 5 10:19:14 PDT 2000
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Timeout.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=13887


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message