From nobody Sun Sep 29 22:47:13 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XGzqF3gwpz5XKl2 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 22:47:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dclarke@blastwave.org) Received: from mail.oetec.com (mail.oetec.com [108.160.241.186]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature ECDSA (P-256) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.oetec.com", Issuer "E5" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XGzqD31ZFz4hNf for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 22:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dclarke@blastwave.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=blastwave.org header.s=default header.b=QPVFKAyK; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dclarke@blastwave.org designates 108.160.241.186 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dclarke@blastwave.org; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=blastwave.org Received: from [172.16.35.3] (pool-99-253-118-250.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.253.118.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.oetec.com (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 48TMlDYr086470 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:47:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dclarke@blastwave.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=blastwave.org; s=default; t=1727650035; bh=AwLLohf2nqskRLANDE9rcs9Y4WCABEVSOKPNDwcQQNE=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=QPVFKAyKWsGiYBV4RKgg3YQdDqNmbA5LhSCOhbXtklUxEoRL8Nd+ZKp/YY+de3iX5 HMlNcUROCrDrMJ07ivtGMnt9IZQZEoUUhCwnKSQlqavYPwQD3OoeZtr0J2zjKWyIJR v40isyz7rR/fCUb45zAUpai3rVSBDNndPfCfZMUdL138B3czAAeRlvRncW1o/79tIx G5JU31VBp4rv0cxrdqmbzuuLshmkFEZPGgMcHzDg1jAo0uvehZfbzol+R+g+wMP+45 amg4mwPCYQztu3SLiTChPlrN2zAVo4qA6qwUN5QRiAMByy0WSS7RojlIQXnzFLRP0R RMaEjSzZWEKBQ== Message-ID: Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 18:47:13 -0400 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Is INET6 a required option these days? (kernel build failure) Content-Language: en-CA To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <202409292002.48TK2wWC093385@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> From: Dennis Clarke Organization: GENUNIX In-Reply-To: <202409292002.48TK2wWC093385@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-oetec-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-oetec-MailScanner-ID: 48TMlDYr086470 X-oetec-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-oetec-MailScanner-From: dclarke@blastwave.org X-Spam-Status: No X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.69 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[blastwave.org,quarantine]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[blastwave.org:s=default]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[108.160.241.186:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[blastwave.org:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:812, ipnet:108.160.240.0/20, country:CA]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4XGzqD31ZFz4hNf X-Spamd-Bar: ---- On 9/29/24 16:02, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 02:13:01PM +0000, Gary Jennejohn wrote: >> ... > NOT all things need to be network connected! > At great risk of tossing yet another coat of paint onto the bikeshed I must agree that a machine with nothing other than serial connection(s) was the norm a long long long time ago. Hench the need for things like UUCP and the dreaded anonymous UUCP. Not that I am going to dig out my old modems and set that up. Today. -- -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken