From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 19 12:43:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28631065692 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 12:43:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from constantine.ticketswitch.com (constantine.ticketswitch.com [IPv6:2002:57e0:1d4e:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22BF98FC1F for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 12:43:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from dilbert.rattatosk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by constantine.ticketswitch.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1M6Ofl-0009by-57; Tue, 19 May 2009 13:43:57 +0100 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1M6Ofl-0001Qb-3v; Tue, 19 May 2009 13:43:57 +0100 To: pluknet@gmail.com In-Reply-To: Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:43:57 +0100 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: So where are we at with bce and lagg then ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:44:00 -0000 > I guess it was fixed in -current in r191923. That looks like the same length fix patch as I was sent for RELENG-7. Unfortunately it has no effect on the problem. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/133756 -pete.