From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 10 23:22: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2284037B401 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 23:21:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from home.com ([24.177.141.133]) by femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010211071937.NHCB2355.femail4.sdc1.sfba.home.com@home.com>; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 23:19:37 -0800 Message-ID: <3A863D8F.6F49A981@home.com> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 23:21:51 -0800 From: "Raymundo M. Vega" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.5.1-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernd Luevelsmeyer Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, Julian Zottl Subject: Re: Bridging and routing problem... References: <200102081626.LAA77762@gateway.vsl.cua.edu> <3A82FEA4.3666D366@home.com> <3A85DA55.10AF0B88@heitec.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bernd Luevelsmeyer wrote: > > Raymundo M. Vega wrote: > [...] > > Rather than answer if bridging is better for your > > network, I like to point thet you will have better > > control in the firewall if you use it as a gateway. > > The packets must go through the firewall whether they are bridged or > routed, so the firewall rules apply in both cases. IMHO there's no > difference in the amount of control. > Just read man bridge raymundo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message