From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr  3 08:41:33 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC21AFA8
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed,  3 Apr 2013 08:41:33 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from artemrts@ukr.net)
Received: from ffe8.ukr.net (ffe8.ukr.net [195.214.192.88])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66898D30
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed,  3 Apr 2013 08:41:33 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net;
 s=ffe; 
 h=Date:Message-Id:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
 bh=P3KBiA3DBuW8lQvOblsVbJFBeuf44SHjJm2MW+a32qY=; 
 b=qBX742VXZ6x5163ZbNeMTgL+MLTnmWnu8BqSt/CQQvWzeAtaPRtGgMZN4pxrpAhNYIV3VHkKIGl0ZE5ehsRUqmE2yqBdnlJD9n8nFv/yU3+dYm1y8FLdZkOhn6UqICucOQ6+egYk4HLjm9u9X7OznbORSkYgl4K7ZIuZb8UNgkE=;
Received: from mail by ffe8.ukr.net with local ID 1UNJG1-0004hX-F2
 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:41:25 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251"
Subject: Re[2]: Is it possible to slow down the network interface?
In-Reply-To: <4B9E361F-D9E7-4A58-A3C1-4E31E3BAF445@DataIX.net>
References: <515B6906.7000305@rawbw.com>
 <4B9E361F-D9E7-4A58-A3C1-4E31E3BAF445@DataIX.net>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
From: "wishmaster" <artemrts@ukr.net>
X-Mailer: freemail.ukr.net 4.0
Message-Id: <11798.1364978485.4558429568794034176@ffe8.ukr.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:41:25 +0300
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:41:33 -0000



 --- Original message ---
From: "Jason Hellenthal" <jhellenthal@dataix.net>
Date: 3 April 2013, 03:16:11

 
> Bandwidth limiting via pf or ipfw ?
  IPFW for this task is the best choice since PF has ALTQ which is 1990s technology.
 For the experimental/testing tasks IPFW has another advantage: this is possibility use as bandwidth limitation as well as delay.