From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 29 14:07:50 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A456916A417 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (thingy.kcilink.com [74.92.149.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799B413C478 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CF4B810 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:07:20 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: References: <31BB09D7-B58A-47AC-8DD1-6BB8141170D8@khera.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <94ECF72B-B0E9-492C-8279-29989FAAE19C@khera.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Vivek Khera Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:07:19 -0400 To: FreeBSD Stable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Re: large RAID volume partition strategy X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:07:50 -0000 On Aug 17, 2007, at 10:44 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > > fdisk and bsdlabels both have a limit: because of the way they > store the > data about the disk space they span, they can't store values that > reference space > 2 TB. In particular, every partition must start > at an > offset <= 2 TB, and cannot be larger than 2 TB. Thanks. This is good advice (along with your other note about doing it in the RAID volume manager). Nearly everyone else decided to jump on the raid level instead and spew forth the "RAID10 is better for database" party line. Well to you folks: once you have 1Gb cache and a lot of disks, there is not much difference between RAID10 and RAID5 or RAID6 in my testing. I ended up making 6 RAID volumes across all the disks to maximize spindle counts and strip the data at 16kB. This seems to work well, and I can assign the other partition as I need later on.