From owner-freebsd-commit Sun Dec 10 07:12:37 1995 Return-Path: owner-commit Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA17364 for freebsd-commit-outgoing; Sun, 10 Dec 1995 07:12:37 -0800 (PST) Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA17239 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sun, 10 Dec 1995 07:11:12 -0800 (PST) Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA17232 for cvs-usrsbin-outgoing; Sun, 10 Dec 1995 07:11:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA17180 Sun, 10 Dec 1995 07:10:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with ESMTP id QAA24514; Sun, 10 Dec 1995 16:09:54 +0100 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id QAA11473; Sun, 10 Dec 1995 16:09:52 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.9) id PAA05914; Sun, 10 Dec 1995 15:19:25 +0100 From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199512101419.PAA05914@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/sendmail/src main.c To: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 1995 15:19:25 +0100 (MET) Cc: ache@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-usrsbin@freefall.freebsd.org Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199512100233.DAA01812@keltia.freenix.fr> from "Ollivier Robert" at Dec 10, 95 03:33:48 am X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-commit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk As Ollivier Robert wrote: > > It seems that Andrey A. Chernov said: > > It seems sendmail becomes more and more incompatible, f.e. > > Return-Receipt-To not works anymore :-( > > It has never been standard anyway. It is expected to be replaced with the > new DSN-* stuff. RIP Return-Receipts. Most of the sites I know don't return > them anyway. Andrey was one of the guys who insisted on getting a R-R for _each_ mail. This has caused me to disable the feature ages ago, since it's simply been too expensive for me (with a UUCP connection, where the R-R required an additional phone call to be delivered). Hence such abuses made it a worthless feature anyway. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)