From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Tue May 8 22:48:00 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF75CFCC9CD for ; Tue, 8 May 2018 22:47:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728DA84BDD for ; Tue, 8 May 2018 22:47:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2ED6DFCC9CC; Tue, 8 May 2018 22:47:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC06FCC9CB for ; Tue, 8 May 2018 22:47:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD5A684BB9 for ; Tue, 8 May 2018 22:47:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB8581EAB for ; Tue, 8 May 2018 22:47:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w48MlvZx092458 for ; Tue, 8 May 2018 22:47:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w48Mlvk5092457 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 8 May 2018 22:47:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227918] [PATCH] remove exists check for CROSS_BINUTILS_PREFIX for external clang builds on secondary arches Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 22:47:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: conf X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 22:48:00 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227918 --- Comment #10 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Kenneth Salerno from comment #9) The question for -B and finding binutils files when there are multiple -B's= is: which -B path ends up being used? In the lib32 failure example, the content= of the two places are not equivalent if I understand right. It appeared that t= he one with the wrong content for lib32 was used for lib32 at the failure poin= t, if I understand right. My understanding of -B is that it is primarily for finding binutils files files but (for gcc/g++) also has -L and -isystem consequences when it points to a directory (that is found), allowing such other types of files to be bundled with the binutils files in the directory structure. Sorry to hear that -mcpu=3Dpower9 has problems of its own. Nothing I've tes= ted is newer than an old PowerMac G5 so-called "Quad Core", so from 2006 or so. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=