From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 13:36:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D351065693 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jt@xoasis.de) Received: from pluto.xoasis.de (pluto.xoasis.de [85.159.14.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607D58FC15 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pad (rh1.xoasis.de [194.77.193.179] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pluto.xoasis.de (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oA1DafU2024391 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:36:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jt@xoasis.de) From: Joerg Traeger To: Andriy Gapon Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:36:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <201011011052.11084.jt@xoasis.de> <201011011341.46906.jt@xoasis.de> <4CCEBCE0.2040308@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <4CCEBCE0.2040308@icyb.net.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201011011436.41296.jt@xoasis.de> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (pluto.xoasis.de [85.159.14.10]); Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:36:44 +0100 (CET) X-XOASIS-EmailScanner-Information: X-XOASIS-EmailScanner: Found to be clean X-XOASIS-EmailScanner-From: jt@xoasis.de Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: est CPU support X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jt@xoasis.de List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:36:49 -0000 On Monday 01 November 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 01/11/2010 14:41 Joerg Traeger said the following: > > On Monday 01 November 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 01/11/2010 14:25 Joerg Traeger said the following: > >>> On Monday 01 November 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >>>> on 01/11/2010 11:52 Joerg Traeger said the following: > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> I have got several mainboards with CPUs which appear not to be > >>>>> supportet by est. An error exists: > >>>>> > >>>>> (examle of somewhat older Intel DG45FC with DualCore E5200 and latest > >>>>> BIOS) > >>>>> > >>>>> est0: on cpu0 > >>>>> est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. > >>>>> est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 61a4c1f06004c1f > >>>>> device_attach: est0 attach returned 6 <---------- > >>>> > >>>> Do you have ACPI enabled? > >>> > >>> Yes, sure it is enabled. > >> > >> Can you upload your acpidump -dt output somewhere and provide a link? > > > > You can read the output here: http://xoasis.de/DG45FC_E5200_acpidump.txt > > Your BIOS doesn't provide _PSS method for processor objects, so est won't > work in general ACPI mode. > You can try putting the following into your loader.conf to try using MSRs > directly, but I don't know if it would help you (or make things worse): > hw.est.msr_info="1" Est still cannot attach. Nov 1 14:28:10 kiste kernel: est0: on cpu0 Nov 1 14:28:10 kiste kernel: est0: Guessed bus clock (high) of 32 MHz Nov 1 14:28:10 kiste kernel: est0: Guessed bus clock (low) of 416 MHz Nov 1 14:28:10 kiste kernel: est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. Nov 1 14:28:10 kiste kernel: est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 61a4c1f06004c1f Nov 1 14:28:10 kiste kernel: device_attach: est0 attach returned 6 Nov 1 14:28:10 kiste kernel: est1: on cpu1 Nov 1 14:28:10 kiste kernel: est1: Guessed bus clock (high) of 32 MHz Nov 1 14:28:10 kiste kernel: est1: Guessed bus clock (low) of 416 MHz Nov 1 14:28:10 kiste kernel: est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. Nov 1 14:28:10 kiste kernel: est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 61a4c1f06004c1f Nov 1 14:28:10 kiste kernel: device_attach: est1 attach returned 6 Is there anything else to try or is Intel (the board vendor) just to blame to omit something important? Windows is able to bypass this problem so Intel will never fix this? -- If you say that you can't, then I shall reply, Parsley, sage, rosemary and thyme