From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 1 15:34:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C4D106564A; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 15:34:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2AB8FC12; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 15:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so8233621eyd.13 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:34:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=2zG2pdmPBuOQLLBD1kPg8ktbMO8dty1/DyLRFOOfDI0=; b=a6MfQ66wIbdEsN2XLFxCP/FCWiPv6Fglo8ZxeTxiv7ClxPY8Sdku08yrQg4SKVJthB FcDfsDyCGXjaZxpNFftniNz7MfTEswu03D48jgVpbZzqFqSI5ICzTny12b2GiN1HewlA jcKKBt1BNxUVQMTkOB7BvXrpK6R/nEzPWa37U= Received: by 10.216.134.80 with SMTP id r58mr5888784wei.63.1320161666151; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:34:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.10.209 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 08:33:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201111011349.pA1DnJdi041135@pointyhat.freebsd.org> References: <201111011349.pA1DnJdi041135@pointyhat.freebsd.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:33:54 -0400 Message-ID: To: Erwin Lansing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:34:28 -0000 On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote: > Dear port maintainers, > > The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate > LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique > LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting > each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports conflict with > ports maintained by another person, please coordinate your efforts with > them. > This was my fault. I won't be around to fix it until late tonight. If no one fixes it before me, I'll get to it then. -- Eitan Adler