From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 28 22:38:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4719E16A502; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:38:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E0D13C465; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:38:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0SMaF46044536; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:36:15 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:36:31 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20080128.153631.-1956306487.imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@des.no From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <86prvluc33.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <86odb6usm6.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080128161300.GP49535@comp.chem.msu.su> <86prvluc33.fsf@ds4.des.no> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: yar@comp.chem.msu.su, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/include fts.h src/lib/libc/gen Makefile.inc Symbol.map fts-compat.c fts-compat.h fts.3 fts.c src/sys/sys param.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:38:11 -0000 In message: <86prvluc33.fsf@ds4.des.no> Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav writes: : Yar Tikhiy writes: : > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav writes: : > > Both C99 and POSIX *require* int64_t and uint64_t on all platform= s that : > > have 64-bit integer types. : > > = : > > FreeBSD has never run on any platform that doesn't. I don't thin= k : > > NetBSD or OpenBSD has either, nor Solaris, nor Linux to my knowle= dge. : > How long ago did you read the Ten C Commandments? You may want to : > refer to the last of them. : = : OK, this has gone way past any technical argument. You're just being= : ornery. Please stop, and revert the change, as you have been asked t= o : by several people already. I don't think he's being ornery at all. In fact, I think you are badgering him without a good technical argument. His changes are fine. There's no need to revert them. Warner