From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 21 17:20:27 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 679C1292;
 Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:20:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.72])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35FDF7F7;
 Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:20:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from c-24-8-230-52.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.230.52]
 helo=damnhippie.dyndns.org)
 by mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
 (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ian@FreeBSD.org>)
 id 1WR37E-000GXT-KH; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:20:20 +0000
Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240])
 by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s2LHKHV4072021;
 Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:20:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org)
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Originating-IP: 24.8.230.52
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see
 http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse
 reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/0mIVqU4NTCgACqjRlEzw1
Subject: Re: Hello fdclose
From: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>
To: Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
In-Reply-To: <86mwgj7aru.fsf@nine.des.no>
References: <CAGOYWV80vTTQbvSjvNa6XBzBiKy+jnGantkUH_RO=8prxoHmyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <201403181404.52197.jhb@freebsd.org>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1403182230140.45496@wonkity.com>
 <201403191523.33275.jhb@freebsd.org>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1403191407240.52822@wonkity.com>
 <86zjkkr5ma.fsf@nine.des.no>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1403210740240.13682@wonkity.com>
 <86fvmbzlbn.fsf@nine.des.no>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1403211030450.14887@wonkity.com>
 <86mwgj7aru.fsf@nine.des.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:20:17 -0600
Message-ID: <1395422417.81853.14.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by damnhippie.dyndns.org
 id s2LHKHV4072021
Cc: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>, jilles@FreeBSD.org,
 freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org,
 Mariusz Zaborski <oshogbo@FreeBSD.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:20:27 -0000

On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 17:54 +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> writes:
> > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> > > I mean the FreeBSD project, and the reason is as John stated: all
> > > sentences must start with a capital letter.  I've gotten so used to
> > > this over the past 15 years that I even do it in email and other
> > > non-FreeBSD written material.
> > "Because it's been that way for 15 years" is not always a
> > justification (consider BIND in base, for example :).
>=20
> "I don't like your answer, so I will ignore it" is not a justification
> either.  It's kindergarden behavior and beneath the dignity of a FreeBS=
D
> committer.
>=20
> We have a rule that sentences must always start with a capital letter.
> The fact that this rule was instituted 15 years ago does not
> automatically invalidate it, and neither does the fact that Joe Random
> Committer disagrees with it.
>=20
> DES

Just as the age of a moronic "rule" such as this doesn't in any way
justify the idea that it could never be changed.  Especially when the
"rule" appears to be an undocumented prejudice.

People love to throw around assertions about "rules" of the English
language.  It doesn't have many rules (subject has to agree in number
with the verb, that's about it for unbreakable rules), but it has as
many opinions on proper style as there are readers and writers.

-- Ian