From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 20 13:29:37 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E130B16A4CF
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:29:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp3.sentex.ca (smtp3.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9829F43FB1
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:29:35 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18])
	by smtp3.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAKLTUm5044073;
	Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:29:30 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27])
	by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAKLTXUr028185;
	Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:29:34 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20031120163143.088deb98@209.112.4.2>
X-Sender: mdtpop@209.112.4.2 (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:33:51 -0500
To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>, stable@freebsd.org
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031120134852.04302668@localhost>
References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org>
 <6.0.1.1.0.20031119234836.0937cd18@209.112.4.2>
 <6.0.0.22.2.20031119222207.036287d8@localhost>
 <6.0.1.1.0.20031120101003.08877350@209.112.4.2>
 <6.0.0.22.2.20031120113043.036bd3f8@localhost>
 <6.0.1.1.0.20031120134324.092acbd0@209.112.4.2>
 <6.0.0.22.2.20031120134852.04302668@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:29:38 -0000


And you are going to use vinum on the twe controller and not apply the fix 
for vinum on the twe ?  Really, you should try it for yourself as others 
have said, or be more specific about what you are asking.

         ---Mike

At 03:52 PM 20/11/2003, Brett Glass wrote:
>Some recent message traffic indicated that these changes were
>important to the operation of vinum, which did not work properly
>unless they were incorporated. That's why I'm curious about whether
>they're necessary.
>
>--Brett
>
>At 11:46 AM 11/20/2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
>
> >I only see the commit to HEAD and not STABLE.
> >
> >        ---Mike