From owner-freebsd-bugs  Tue Mar 30  3:15:22 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.9])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FC115AB4
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 03:15:18 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA16871;
	Tue, 30 Mar 1999 21:14:56 +1000
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 21:14:56 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199903301114.VAA16871@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, sheldonh@iafrica.com
Subject: Re: i386/8894
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, skumles@yahoo.com
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

>> CPU_WT_ALLOC should have no effect on the problem, since it should
>> only be used if the cpu is Cyrix or AMD.
>
>What does "should only be used" mean? Does it mean that CPU_WT_ALLOC has
>no impact on kernel operations when the CPU is not a Cyrix nor an AMD?

It means, "is only used, modulo bugs".

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message