From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 15:59:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3437B106564A for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 15:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danallen46@airwired.net) Received: from mail.utahbroadband.com (mail.utahbroadband.com [204.14.20.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E720C8FC0A for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 15:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7360 invoked by uid 89); 9 Nov 2010 15:59:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.18?) (danallen46@airwired.net@66.29.174.6) by mail.utahbroadband.com with ESMTPA; 9 Nov 2010 15:59:33 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Dan Allen In-Reply-To: <4CD967CB.5090201@icyb.net.ua> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:59:31 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <817835F0-91C1-4945-917A-9C582C4FDFF6@airwired.net> References: <68E248E0-8619-4859-BFFE-1B5F5ABBC51F@airwired.net> <4CD11FE9.8050105@freebsd.org> <5224E1F5-4567-45A8-A12C-868F7B45BC21@airwired.net> <4CD42127.5070902@icyb.net.ua> <4CD8DC87.3090207@icyb.net.ua> <24FCCE4A-C7C2-4EDE-9521-3D562391ACE4@airwired.net> <4CD9648A.2080606@icyb.net.ua> <4CD967CB.5090201@icyb.net.ua> To: Andriy Gapon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: Sergey Kandaurov , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Re: Fatal trap 18 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:59:34 -0000 On 9 Nov 2010, at 8:24 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 09/11/2010 17:22 Dan Allen said the following: >>=20 >> On 9 Nov 2010, at 8:11 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>=20 >>> /boot/loader.conf contents >>=20 >> This might be the smoking gun! >>=20 >> cat loader.conf: >>=20 >> hint.apic.0.disabled=3D"1" >=20 > Yes, it is. > So why do you have it and what happens if you remove it? Well, there is good news and bad news. The good news is that if I remove this hint the machine boots with 2 = CPUs. The bad news is that I get lots of: CPU0: local APIC error 0x40 CPU1: local APIC error 0x40 messages and the machine is very unresponsive. Every keystroke has a = second or two of delay. It really is unusable. If memory serves I had to turn off APIC in order to see both CPUs at = some time in the past. However, at some time in the past I had both = CPUs and did not have the severe unresponsiveness that I get without = this hint. So with APIC I get both CPUs but an unusable config. Without APIC I = have one CPU but things are lively. What next? Dan