From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 21 04:44:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491AE16A421 for ; Mon, 21 May 2007 04:44:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from host222.ipowerweb.com (host222.ipowerweb.com [66.235.210.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AD2413C469 for ; Mon, 21 May 2007 04:44:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 90212 invoked from network); 21 May 2007 04:42:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO demeter.hydra) (24.9.123.251) by host222.ipowerweb.com with SMTP; 21 May 2007 04:42:10 -0000 Received: from demeter.hydra (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l4L4iW9J091234; Sun, 20 May 2007 22:44:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (from ren@localhost) by demeter.hydra (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l4L4iUrh091233; Sun, 20 May 2007 22:44:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) X-Authentication-Warning: demeter.hydra: ren set sender to perrin@apotheon.com using -f Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 22:44:30 -0600 From: Chad Perrin To: "Tamouh H." Message-ID: <20070521044430.GB91151@demeter.hydra> References: <20070520221917.GA91736@ezekiel.daleco.biz> <1a9901c79b3c$4774abc0$6600a8c0@tamouh> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1a9901c79b3c$4774abc0$6600a8c0@tamouh> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: 'Anton Galitch' , questions@freebsd.org, 'Ted Mittelstaedt' Subject: Re: just general questions about fbsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 04:44:34 -0000 On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 08:09:19PM -0400, Tamouh H. wrote: > > On the other hand, Windows has the ability to change the administrator user or completely disable it. Something not available in Unix systems. For example, a cracker or hacker targeting UNIX system will automatically try to compromise the "root" user. It is 100% guaranteed to be there. On the other hand in Windows, good sys admins will rename or complete disable the administrator user hence making it more difficult to know the administrator user. > Actually . . . technically, root users can be renamed and can, in many ways, be disabled. They can certainly be made inaccessible remotely. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] W. Somerset Maugham: "The ability to quote is a serviceable substitute for wit."