Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 23:47:02 -0700 From: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> To: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> Cc: Mark Millard via freebsd-uboot <freebsd-uboot@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: poudriere-devel build of sysutils/u-boot-pine64 | u-boot-pine64-2018.07_1 failed Message-ID: <4DBB7051-AEC9-4ECA-B645-0A5AF1C7C856@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <DD97C57E-D956-4CB3-B306-E31F07192B1B@yahoo.com> References: <451D906A-3807-4029-BFFA-1A00AD8FB0F9@yahoo.com> <6D377AEB-C359-4DC3-A95F-2A4A72CBF090@yahoo.com> <20180801095942.91dfc4d5907b75b4fe63c1d0@bidouilliste.com> <E88C0B8E-F28C-457E-8A13-4CB593F72FA3@yahoo.com> <20180802060927.72eadf5b1f8fe8bcf8860dc3@bidouilliste.com> <DD97C57E-D956-4CB3-B306-E31F07192B1B@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[See https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230288 .] On 2018-Aug-1, at 10:57 PM, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 2018-Aug-1, at 9:09 PM, Emmanuel Vadot <manu at bidouilliste.com> = wrote: >=20 >> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 07:02:08 -0700 >> Mark Millard via freebsd-uboot <freebsd-uboot at freebsd.org> wrote: >>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On 2018-Aug-1, at 12:59 AM, Emmanuel Vadot <manu at = bidouilliste.com> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> . . . >>>=20 >>> Definitely true that I do not yet know what matters for this = context. >>> I'll continue to try to figure that out. >>=20 >> Well it's a port and you are building via poudriere so just put the >> log file (the full log file) somewhere so we can have a look. >> Also arch, ports tree revision, blah, the usual suspects. >=20 > The build did not get far: the log file is only 747 lines long. I'll > probably submit a bugzilla for the issue at some point. I'll report > the number when I do. See: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230288 > I suggest looking at: >=20 > = https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2018-August/113981.html >=20 > for a recent build failure type that I analyzed (devel/*-gcc = failures). John Baldwin > reduced the history down to the final result for our exchanges and so = it will will not > be a long read. The issue was tied to my use of WITHOUT_BINTUILS for = the buildworld > that was installed and in use but devel/powerpc64-gcc (the master port = for the > devel/*-gcc ports) not listing devel/binutils in BUILD_DEPENDS in = addition to the > historical devel/${PKGNAMEPREFIX}binutils for the cross-build. >=20 > Other gcc-ish ports that cross-build things may have similar issues = with expecting > but missing "builder-architecture" tools from binutils. I'm not = claiming that is > the problem here but it is a fairly new type of problem to be aware = of. >=20 >=20 >=20 > Just FYI for the pine64 u-boot port context: > (To be in the bugzilla submittal as well.) >=20 > # uname -apKU > FreeBSD FBSDUSSD 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT r336693M amd64 = amd64 1200075 1200075 >=20 > (The "M" is mostly for experiments targeting powerpc and powerpc64 > via fairly modern toolchains. The poudriere-devel jail uses an > install-tree installed from the same buildworld.) >=20 > # svnlite info /usr/ports/ | grep "Re[plv]" > Relative URL: ^/head > Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports > Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 > Revision: 476026 > Last Changed Rev: 476026 =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DBB7051-AEC9-4ECA-B645-0A5AF1C7C856>