From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 24 15:00:54 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA19655 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 15:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ki.net (root@ki.net [205.150.102.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA19644 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 15:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by ki.net (8.7.5/8.7.5) with SMTP id SAA01080; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 18:01:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 18:01:11 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Nate Williams cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: anoncvs In-Reply-To: <199607242154.PAA02423@rocky.mt.sri.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 24 Jul 1996, Nate Williams wrote: > [ Anon CVS ]> > > > I've had users ask me fo rthis for the postgres95 repository, > > and the argument they used was tha twith CVS, they don't have to deal > > with having *(their* changes overwritten, cvs will merge the new changes > > from the repository in with the changes they have made... > > > > Can sup do this? > > If they SUP the CVS tree and don't expect to use the CVS tree locally > except for testingt, yes. Almost all of the FreeeBSD developers do this > exact thing as your pstgres developers are asking. Ahhh, okay, now I understand wha tyuo mean...yes, to me thi sdoes act as an acceptable solution to anoncvs, thanks :) Marc G. Fournier scrappy@ki.net Systems Administrator @ ki.net scrappy@freebsd.org