From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 15 15:40:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ABA8361; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 15:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps.amdmi3.ru (vps.amdmi3.ru [109.234.38.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6A7F77; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 15:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hive.panopticon (unknown [213.148.20.85]) by vps.amdmi3.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10967B060F; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 18:40:24 +0300 (MSK) Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.32]) by hive.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0387621B; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 18:38:51 +0300 (MSK) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5BD454610; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 18:40:05 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 18:40:05 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: Re: svn commit: r381196 - head/converters/p5-Encode-JIS2K Message-ID: <20150315154004.GE18303@hades.panopticon> References: <201503131326.t2DDQrUw087705@svn.freebsd.org> <20150313170805.GB12328@FreeBSD.org> <20150313231612.GD18303@hades.panopticon> <20150314113758.GA93218@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150314113758.GA93218@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 15:40:32 -0000 * Alexey Dokuchaev (danfe@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > > How feasible would it be to group this kind of similar commits together > > > (at least per-category)? > > > > Unfortunately, it won't. I do, test and commit these on individual basis. > > Doing and testing are certainly per-port thing; yet I do not see why > deferring commit (esp. given that changes are typically small and trivial) > is not possible. Commit corresponds to a single isolated change, which is a change to a single port. Artifically grouping them is pointless and evil, as it makes merges and reverts harder. Actually, it's just the coincidence that this serie had the same commit message. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://amdmi3.ru