From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 21:42:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1738E16A4CE for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:42:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-234.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3978143FBD for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:42:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 687A966C8E; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:42:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:42:12 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Harald Schmalzbauer Message-ID: <20031117054212.GA24229@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200311170439.13103@harrymail> <20031117042542.GA96576@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <200311170541.09527@harrymail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200311170541.09527@harrymail> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Steve Kargl Subject: Re: init and USB oddities-ULE-ATA X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 05:42:14 -0000 --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 05:41:04AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Give setiathome a try! You'll be astonished. And I'm sure the difference = I=20 > _feel_ isn't dependend on kde. If you don't like kde replace it with our= =20 > favourite wm/desktop. But you won't be able to play two mid to high-quali= ty=20 > mpegs at the same time on a 1GHz machine where 4BSD scheduler does very w= ell! >=20 > I haven't claimed ULE to be unstable though. I just wanted to highlight s= ome=20 > issues which will be a big problem if 5.2-releas will have ULE as default! Sorry if you've already mentioned this, but what threading system are you using (i.e. libc_r, libthr, libkse)? Kris --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/uF+0Wry0BWjoQKURAjCeAKDVT2f0ob7vdwsmOwTVs+gf1UCcNgCgn7tJ /BZ8M5PSPga12Yl7O7HshFA= =2kPu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6--