From owner-freebsd-gnome Wed Oct 2 1:47:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CE337B404 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 01:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.contentmedia.de (www.contentmedia.de [213.61.138.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57C8943E75 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 01:47:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from recht@contentmedia.de) Received: (qmail 17826 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 08:44:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO leeloo.intern.geht.de) (217.227.199.22) by www.contentmedia.de with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 08:44:28 -0000 Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:47:27 +0200 From: Marc Recht To: Joe Marcus Clarke Cc: aztlanet@gmx.net, gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: GNOME 2.1 upgrade Message-Id: <20021002104727.590f03a0.recht@contentmedia.de> In-Reply-To: <1033548212.1085.1.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> References: <1033527725.295.11.camel@unxstar> <20021002104009.5a55baec.recht@contentmedia.de> <1033548212.1085.1.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> Organization: contentmedia AG X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.2claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.lUrQE3:X1AN65/" Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --=.lUrQE3:X1AN65/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > This isn't going to happen anytime soon. We're shipping 4.7-RELEASE > with 1.4.1 as the default GNOME desktop. The primary reasons being lack Oh. Ok, then dropping 1.4.1 isn't that good idea.. :-) > of fully working I18N and most GNOME 2 apps are still beta at best. Indeed. > I think doing -devel versions is the way to go if 2.1 is put into the > tree. The downside of this is that there will be one more version of > GNOME to support. But, as you mentioned yourself, GNOME2 is beta. So, why not replacing the components with "official" beta versions? Marc --=.lUrQE3:X1AN65/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9mrKf7YQCetAaG3MRAs7TAJ9jY2iKtTRlAV+FD6V/jLt3FLhN/wCeLTIW JmUb3QGUBysBIVRBlTZOgTs= =4yz5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.lUrQE3:X1AN65/-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message