From owner-freebsd-doc Wed Oct 10 17:21:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from king.swox.se (king.swox.se [212.247.3.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF47937B406; Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:21:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by king.swox.se (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9F78C32A8; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 02:21:51 +0200 (CEST) To: John Baldwin Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Suggestion for FAQ References: From: Torbjorn Granlund Date: 11 Oct 2001 02:21:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: John Baldwin's message of "Wed, 10 Oct 2001 17:09:08 -0700 (PDT)" Message-ID: <86ofnfjaao.fsf@king.swox.se> Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org John Baldwin writes: > FreeBSD 3.x and 4.x already support Athlon systems. It's on the > CD case for 4.4 and should be in the release notes if not already. > Appropriate wording should probably be added to the FAQ as well. >=20=20=20 > You're not reading what I wrote, are you? :-) =20=20 Um, yes. I did :) =20=20 Alright, I read your reply too literally. That -stable supports SMP Athlon is great news! Since the load of the system is coarse-grained, current SMP should be perfectly adequate. Yes, it really ought to be mentioned, and the kernel source (some *apic*.h file) should perhaps also mention that Athlon systems will work. Its current wording sound like it excludes Athlon. --=20 Torbj=F6rn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message