Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:35:12 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VsOhY2xhdiBIYWlzbWFu?= <V.Haisman@sh.cvut.cz> To: joerg@britannica.bec.de Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CALL FOR TESTERS] New system call: abort2() Message-ID: <43A1FDB0.8090907@sh.cvut.cz> In-Reply-To: <20051215232143.GC203@britannica.bec.de> References: <20051215223745.GA37768@FreeBSD.czest.pl> <43A1F97A.3060102@sh.cvut.cz> <20051215232143.GC203@britannica.bec.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] joerg@britannica.bec.de wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:17:14AM +0100, Václav Haisman wrote: > >>I would like to comment on FreeBSD style(9) a bit. Why does not mention >>or even encourage C99 style // comments? They are nice when one wants to >>comment out bigger chunks of code with /**/ comment. > > > Use #if 0 ... #endif for that. Well, that was the only option in time of C90, now we have IMO better facility for this. Also most editors do not mark such code as commented out which might a bit inconvenient. > > Joerg > > >>On the similar note, the ability to move declarations closer to the >>point of use in code is IMO nice feature, too. The style(9) doesn't >>mention this either. > > > Because it is not necessarily a good thing. I am of different opinion but I will leave it at that. > > Joerg Vaclav Haisman [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEVAwUBQ6H9t256zbtzMDG0AQKktgf+NJyTKJv0iIdUywqhOFjppnyvOHBxt9b2 fzKNYkDG0VvGTogfepFrlKHtJLRE4ZPdxRB59mfE7h6WYFaMXPqOnQ41F4wohchR ez1wqKRCzPoQkn/nTF8eq41sh0dJjR83EOH+unDxhmmq3qTbQhg86kd5JfM4KSbp xPCU+ohbRBrtDbKP71xj7kUbji6oNYMBZgs+Psl8oHKpEIUT/Ve1rsMDVDiy1jqQ V6UBjau+1rO/zFyFQZ/50EFhi3JOnYmiHCjL9kir5beVyGEfxX3ceWZlkaZIRHP3 fe5mNIgIi/Nm3jsUIVzS8PerpmUYoUY207s6QuaTTO53BJm+pN04CA== =hsox -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43A1FDB0.8090907>