From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Dec 14 15:43:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (fac13.ds.psu.edu [146.186.61.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0214537B417 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:43:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from fac13.ds.psu.edu (localhost.ds.psu.edu [127.0.0.1]) by fac13.ds.psu.edu (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fBENhKU66578; Fri, 14 Dec 2001 18:43:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) Message-Id: <200112142343.fBENhKU66578@fac13.ds.psu.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Edwin Groothuis Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Erik Trulsson Subject: Re: is xlockmore orphaned? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 15 Dec 2001 10:23:25 +1100." <20011215102325.I724@k7.mavetju.org> From: dochawk@psu.edu Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 18:43:20 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Edwin emitted, > On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 04:14:43PM -0500, Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > > I believe that it's been a year now since xlockmore could build > > successfully. > > has anyone successfully built it in the last few months? > This morning, just to see if you were right. > It compiled fine, running 4.4 with XFree86-4 and having XFREE86_VERSION=4 > in /etc/make.conf. > What are you running? STABLE, up to this morning, with XFREE86_VERSION=4 in /etc/make.conf. I've successfully upgraded nearly everything with portupgrade. I've been having the same problem with this one port for many, many months . . . hawk -- What part of "non-negotiable" didn't you understand? /"\ ASCII ribbon campaign dochawk@psu.edu Smeal 178 (814) 375-4700 \ / against HTML mail These opinions will not be those of X and postings. Penn State until it pays my retainer. / \ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message