Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:21:16 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> Cc: Alexey Shuvaev <shuvaev@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, office@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [clang] OpenOffice does not work with clang-compiled libgcc_s.so.1 Message-ID: <CADLo838Yk9yxZaAV16%2Bj92myVO2Eo6X4dUwit_XVvwcfZYpMPw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83-6mptusi1-%2B0E_gVG0JXbY699ezHCOsBdbuqMiE4u8qw@mail.gmail.com> References: <20110727101918.GA86589@lexx.ifp.tuwien.ac.at> <4E305510.1010900@FreeBSD.org> <CADLo83-6mptusi1-%2B0E_gVG0JXbY699ezHCOsBdbuqMiE4u8qw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 July 2011 19:18, Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 27 July 2011 19:12, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On 2011-07-27 12:19, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: >> ... >>> >>> So, if I compile the whole world (and kernel) with clang, soffice.bin >>> dumps core. If I recompile the world with gcc and replace >>> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 >>> with the new one, OpenOffice works fine again. >> >> Hmm, OpenOffice is a rather unwieldy testcase, not in the least because >> it takes ages and many gigabytes to build. :( =A0Did you or anyone else >> ever find a smaller testcase? > > CCing office@, maintainers -- could be interested and may give answers. > > FWIW, LibreOffice is probably a better target for clang -- seems to be > The Future. By the way, I didn't mean that OOo is 'deprecated' at all; maho is still working on it. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838Yk9yxZaAV16%2Bj92myVO2Eo6X4dUwit_XVvwcfZYpMPw>