From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb  2 17:09:11 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E29A10657C2
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Feb 2012 17:09:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596798FC12
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Feb 2012 17:09:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id A247756205; Thu,  2 Feb 2012 11:09:10 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:09:10 -0600
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120202170910.GB28461@lonesome.com>
References: <4F296566.805@secnap.com> <20120202051921.GC6434@lonesome.com>
	<4F2A494F.5000807@secnap.com>
	<CADLo83-Xu6baHRejTuodABCTaTOJ_5x809iU23+2bnCSJ8=6TQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADLo83-Xu6baHRejTuodABCTaTOJ_5x809iU23+2bnCSJ8=6TQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Michael Scheidell <michael.scheidell@secnap.com>
Subject: Re: not for arch? use arch? don't care arch?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:09:11 -0000

On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:38:38AM +0000, Chris Rees wrote:
> We don't build sparc packages, so no Pavmail.

Gee, I sure *thought* I was building sparc64 packages:

  $ showrunning | grep sparc64
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 harlow.cse.buffalo.edu math/labplot
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 harlow.cse.buffalo.edu math/p5-GIS-Distance-Lite
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 harlow.cse.buffalo.edu math/p5-Geo-Coordinates-UTM
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 harlow.cse.buffalo.edu math/p5-Math-Algebra-Symbols
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 pcrz173.uni-regensburg.de math/coinmp
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 pcrz173.uni-regensburg.de math/p5-Bit-ShiftReg
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 pcrz173.uni-regensburg.de math/p5-Date-Handler
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 pcrz173.uni-regensburg.de math/p5-GIS-Distance-Fast
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.com mail/quickml
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.com math/fung-calc
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.com math/guppi
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.com math/kseg
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.com math/lapacke
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.com math/libflame
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.com math/naturalmath
  sparc64-9 20120123043600 scruffy.exit2shell.com math/p5-AI-NeuralNet-BackProp

Yep.  I am.

So, pav runs the amd64 ones, erwin runs the i386 ones, I run sparc64 and
powerpc (32-bit mode).  Once every few weeks one of my runs actually
finishes.

I send out mail whenever I mark things broken, but I don't necessarily
expect anyone to take action, it's more FYI.

mcl