Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:20:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Schoolcraft <bill@wiliweld.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: .wma music files (amd64 woes...) Message-ID: <20051016141617.D48641@liam.billschoolcraft.com> In-Reply-To: <cb5206420510161404r11b2e680t9e6151d73985260f@mail.gmail.com> References: <200510170014.36661.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> <20051016141616.GA10606@yoafrica.com> <20051016092201.A48641@liam.billschoolcraft.com> <43529782.4010201@mkproductions.org> <20051016124158.D48641@liam.billschoolcraft.com> <4352ADE2.5090502@mkproductions.org> <20051016134218.T48641@liam.billschoolcraft.com> <cb5206420510161404r11b2e680t9e6151d73985260f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Mon, 17 Oct 2005 it looks like Andrew P. composed: <humbly_snipped> > > It's not a problem with FreeBSD, really. The ports > themselves should get to work under amd64. Ahh, very good point. I didn't look at it from that angle. > 2006 will probably become the year of widespread > adoption of 64-bit computing. Until it ends, you'd > better use FreeBSD/i386 on your desktops. All > server software that was popular enough was > ensured to run on FreeBSD/amd64 smoothly. Yes, the "flash" plugin had me sigh also... From being used to using Unix based OS's for a while, I've come to "not" expect flash to work on anything, sad as it may seem. I guess it's like the "unix-fonts" in our browsers, you kinda get numb to the whole thing. Thanks for the replies. -- Bill Schoolcraft PO Box 210076 San Francisco, CA 94121 http://billschoolcraft.com ~ "You do best what you like most."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051016141617.D48641>