From nobody Tue Nov 21 07:53:03 2023 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SZGnq68jsz5221q for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SZGnq48Xpz4Qyf for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1700553183; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cV0rdiIDPCMxv+GS2YNwqWQFQofcFbJ3B34nOziTIz4=; b=A09uHhwg9YEcZfvw4piRH+3d0WmFOxiXgnrwUQBMGYJURnx9fgahAKRk/5ZzC6XV3WEOkN j6CehB4YU7jgInuCBezhRGrpU4qGv0pVKiACgLVTvHxN2JCWrEV8T7YW5YhDAespiimuc5 9JGsJapM9xCaJ7UskEaWq6qm8q0FLNNCdpeFlbj74ehDOeAjdrMdWFmnYCzIVMHFlAmjQB kXnZTNAuDeqCvn/wfdFTa9LuKbu9FGIPKUmQriSYxHpn0FRPKkKoXUxS3Z3dFAG2EBxcab AoWm6TKITF4e4p8pXeER+5RMN0apZUD3slAZKTTqvwZh2Jg0jILbGilzfObLHQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1700553183; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ZtJ1t6bxfUf5gSVtyvnede+TnVOOqFxxlhGuf1k3iTj1AfvxOzlQwX+jh4wgMdjD88lVwA 542aodSRoknod6rh+XEmVGFBqy/vkrhwa2pioBSZ87V0WD2vvvZIPxnnQDLIicqPk/QOlR 8CxhAa4N02tK9/XCokkFpffT8vXNTshUofJwYZXSw5oFnkWn3u5d0h2zdjTXIYa2e8xlCK r2NwU3gE2TRtumeTY4MOuzvFHZN1gjCfbfQLcZ2EjHUI4KZUuWag+3ykCWnvwVxDdUXwBt dtRW2Kj4Y7tmIN0+C3/F+aWCjHYtlJzXuD/fS+apD0ju/zFwwWmF2bOyt9yG2w== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SZGnq3GSwzCVN for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 3AL7r3Ll026995 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:53:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 3AL7r3Jw026994 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:53:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 275169] Panic: rw_rlock: wlock already held for tcpinp @ /usr/src/sys/netinet/in_pcb.c:2529 Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:53:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: i.dani@outlook.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D275169 --- Comment #17 from Dani I. --- (In reply to Gleb Smirnoff from comment #16) Ah sorry, that wasn't clear in my last comment. No, we have just used "net.link.ether.ipfw=3D1" while testing with out 13.2 hosts - we do not hav= e it set in productive environment. What i meant were the fw rules from our init= ial report, which worked well and without a problem on 12.4: Host A has following IPFW rule: ipfw add 1000 allow ip from me to 10.1.1.20/32 uid 0 Host B has the following IPFW rule: ipfw add 2000 allow tcp from any to 10.1.1.20 80,443 keep-state --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=