From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 25 18:01:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35601065689; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 18:01:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacombar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7298FC1D; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 18:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi7 with SMTP id 7so1185893pwi.13 for ; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:01:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5MLmO27HMRoD5beADsEpzSMRz76nfECNh3bY3icS/h0=; b=ipHnDMY9bS5vrYojATW/W8iR75oTA4Zp6RMJOCc7B9B/ZXQfQUXzQ240UaOztavE8K yRdxPt89XEILqvj31ljSxyNxWMBaf76xSqjZQXq4p9/rjiZc7cthX3kLGlAP/t6y8Art A7exXzVPTRiSHl4QmM9ge40f7l0Z5UslJwS8E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Z9pyMwK81ckKRhqy2P1orURFznOdViJpPKZ0BJfmFXB0TeBX3e6brvs8INGubjPnEF j8RpkkWkxJg4b65Smjdp2p13Dmqr1Tqla18aliL7Z6N5AUEi0CIOLUK9mdIl3URFltjO h71ifrRZ9ToIINxm7SiYi9cfgQ+c3yswZN/YE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.22.198 with SMTP id g6mr2217063pbf.218.1309024887914; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.56.8 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Jun 2011 11:01:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4D934AF4.9080503@FreeBSD.org> <742085CD-7F6F-4879-9FFD-517EC3203D52@bsdimp.com> <5AF348C8-6AB6-490D-A12E-89A51528F58F@bsdimp.com> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 14:01:27 -0400 Message-ID: From: Arnaud Lacombe To: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: mdf@freebsd.org, "Robert N. M. Watson" , Dimitry Andric , freebsd-hackers Subject: Re: Include file search path X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 18:01:28 -0000 Hi, On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> On May 22, 2011, at 9:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> >>> Hi Warner, >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Warner Losh wrote: >>>> >>>> On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:47, Warner Losh wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> (2) Working clang/LLVM cross-compile of FreeBSD. =A0This seems like= a basic >>>>>>> =A0requirement to adopt clang/LLVM, and as far as I'm aware that's = not yet a >>>>>>> =A0resolved issue? >>>>>> >>>>>> 0 work has been done here to my knowledge. =A0The world view for cla= ng and our in-tree gcc differ which makes it a challenge. >>>>> >>>>> That's disappointing. I seem to recall it's more an issue of our buil= d integration with clang/LLVM than an underlying issue in clang/LLVM? >>>> >>>> Yes. =A0The problem isn't hard, the cross compile paradigm is just a l= ittle different. >>>> >>>>>>> We (Cambridge) are currently bringing up FreeBSD on a new soft-core= 64-bit MIPS platform. =A0We're already using a non-base gcc for our boot l= oader work, and plan to move to using clang/LLVM later in the year. =A0The = base system seems a bit short on detail when it comes to the above, current= ly. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes. =A0I've had to add about a dozen changes so far to get close to= building with xdev compilers. =A0A similar number are needed to make it ea= sy to configure and add systree support, I think. >>>>> >>>>> Sounds like great progress -- do you think we'll ship 9.0 in a "just = works" state with regard to this? >>>> >>>> I sure hope so. =A0I'd like to have demoable stuff by BSDcan. >>>> >>> BSDCan has passed, has there been any advance made since that discussio= n ? >> >> It is "demonstrable" but not ready to commit to the tree. =A0Needs about= 4 hours of work that I've had trouble scheduling on it due to work getting= busier than I expected. >> > any chances to have a look at the patch or should I wait for the final co= mmit ? > ping ? - Arnaud