From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Sep  4 12: 6:10 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.hiwaay.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2F6FE37B43E; Mon,  4 Sep 2000 12:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bonsai.hiwaay.net (tnt6-216-180-4-184.dialup.HiWAAY.net [216.180.4.184])
	by mail.hiwaay.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e84J64732155;
	Mon, 4 Sep 2000 14:06:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by bonsai.hiwaay.net (8.11.0/8.9.3) id e84J63J64513;
	Mon, 4 Sep 2000 14:06:03 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from steve)
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 14:06:03 -0500
From: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>
To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Retiring `-b' fetch(1) option from ports
Message-ID: <20000904140603.E266@bonsai.hiwaay.net>
References: <39B391E2.F30C1385@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <39B391E2.F30C1385@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 03:13:22PM +0300
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 03:13:22PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
# What do people think about the following patch?

[FETCH_BEFORE_ARGS patch elided]

Looks like a good idea.  Since this only affects people that are
using a release older than 4.1 and only then if they update their
ports collection.  This should not be a problem there either if we
can get Satoshi to include an updated fetch(1) in the appropriate
*upgrade port.

Here are a few other ports that will need similar fixes.

graphics/graphviz
graphics/linux-bmrt
japanese/chimera
japanese/gawk
japanese/gd
japanese/sed
net/zebra
net/openh323
net/opengatekeeper
net/openam

-steve


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message