Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:21:53 -0800 From: Joshua Lokken <joshua@twobirds.us> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel configuration Message-ID: <20040326202153.GC1948@cs025_2k> In-Reply-To: <20040326194319.GA28352@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <B36C365832C90E47A37F4FFCDDEFC46D3D5FF7@hkisrv08.tw.fi> <20040326183919.GB27638@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040326190349.GB1948@cs025_2k> <20040326194319.GA28352@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> [2004-03-26 11:57]: > [ kernel modules ] > > If you put NO_MODULES=true into /etc/make.conf, then you'll only get > the kernel build. You won't get any extra loadable modules. Got it. Thank you. On my workstations, where resources are plentiful, I suppose it doesn't matter much to have all of the kernel modules built and installed, but on resource-scant or single-purpose machines (ie firewall/router), it seems that it would be somewhat significant to exclude them. Others' feedback? -- Joshua What kind of love is that? Not to be loved; never to have shown love. -- Commissioner Nancy Hedford, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3219.8
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040326202153.GC1948>