From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jan 29 09:29:31 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA15766 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 09:29:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [165.254.13.209]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA15761 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 09:29:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from dialup-110.cdmo.com (dialup-110.cdmo.com [204.141.95.167]) by etinc.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA12088; Mon, 29 Jan 1996 12:27:11 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 12:27:11 -0500 Message-Id: <199601291727.MAA12088@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) From: dennis@etinc.com (dennis) Subject: Re: Dennis' Behavior (was Re: Multi-Port Async Cards) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >The only purpose of Nate's mail was to tell you that provocating >flame-wars is not what we would like to see on the mailing list. >Nothing more, but nothing less. > >p.s.: You've widened the auditorium in your reply. I consider this >bad taste, or a violation of commonly agreed terms of a Netiquette. There was/is no resulting "flame war" from my question on serial cards....the only flame war here is a direct result of nate's post to ban me. Perhaps Nate should be banned? Dennis ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Emerging Technologies, Inc. http://www.etinc.com Synchronous Communications Cards and Routers For Discriminating Tastes. 56k to T1 and beyond. Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC, and X.25 for BSD/OS, FreeBSD and LINUX