From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep  1 04:58:59 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC8A1065675;
	Wed,  1 Sep 2010 04:58:59 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com)
Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC408FC12;
	Wed,  1 Sep 2010 04:58:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34so7976424wwb.31
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to
	:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc
	:content-type; bh=kX5fY+v7S/X4jyYqD3z0mcUqBzAlEXnvcBlulm3IPrg=;
	b=FM9gWabv1hUTCWHEBHCgQXjcyNXEL4Lhgz73QvLjpYqkae85G0NGicGoL5XWumtuZ1
	S1bUUKmFcla20cFOWqGLM39+xJJR5v7KabJlD8vBwxh60jJY1DIdD7lYw5I5x46aXlVA
	BGOCm0IEOfP8ANilYLaLnVCAVotwQ1nC6aZB0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
	:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	b=gyvB9Jn/8MxjWjrc8b9jKCQQWMQWwtI87ymnq4TvVJum+CB/dWTVQXo6FpNvbXKR+E
	y4YjyuMQYNOdWWVcsDmmo9DvXG8LtQHK1tEshKCHb6zERpR4MJ9JVEkYd0KgbBUCQu+h
	MlKjz5SFQUIKM0IH6Kp/6LPlQzqT8+++R4tiM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.68.149 with SMTP id v21mr7566016wbi.138.1283317138487;
	Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.63.146 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinVXMOanGiMsBGBgyMtOWpDEUrLzaetZfFXn7p_@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinhAPY-PEH_TegMAEx1ejHf_WoEL8KZU+oXGhFD@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C7D76A6.7080401@DataIX.net>
	<AANLkTi=X6=o6bLy4EcGafiinK0UWjzUUPL6NNM6ad0i8@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinVXMOanGiMsBGBgyMtOWpDEUrLzaetZfFXn7p_@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 04:58:58 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTin0HJCRUaJqepEESXJ8gO1qSpTx3dhfu6GnfNWZ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>
To: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: maho@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:59:00 -0000

On 9/1/10, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:06 PM, b. f. <bf1783@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On 8/31/10, jhell <jhell@dataix.net> wrote:

>So according to bsd.own.mk, this is the correct test for the math/blas
>port to determine if profiling libraries should be built:
>
>.if !defined(WITHOUT_PROFILE)
>PLIST_FILES+=   lib/libblas_p.a
>.endif

No, you are leaving the order out of account.  Apart from local and
custom makefiles, the makefiles are included so:

/usr/share/mk/sys.mk
/etc/make.conf
/usr/share/mk/bsd.compat.mk
usr/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk
Makefile(for math/blas)
/usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk
/usr/share/mk/bsd.own.mk
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.commands.mk
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.perl.mk
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.perl.mk
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.licenses.mk
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.sites.mk
...

So if NO_PROFILE or NOPROFILE is defined, a test for WITHOUT_PROFILE
in Makefile will still fail because NO_PROFILE is not mapped to
WITHOUT_PROFILE until bsd.own.mk, after the test.  Just be patient and
we'll sort it out.

>
> As can be seen, NOPROFILE is deprecated.

It may be deprecated, but it will still take effect without
BURN_BRIDGES, and so still must be accounted for.

>
> NOTE: WITHOUT_PROFILE would need to be set in /etc/make.conf (instead
> of /etc/src.conf) to disable building profiled libraries in the
> FreeBSD sources and the math/blas port.

No, it will still take effect, after the math/blas Makefile is parsed,
unless _WITHOUT_SRCCONF is defined.  See bsd.own.mk.

b.