From owner-freebsd-current Tue Oct 24 11:39:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DA837B4CF for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:39:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9OIdZn87888; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:39:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id MAA17689; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:39:34 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010241839.MAA17689@harmony.village.org> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" Subject: Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Cc: "Brandon D. Valentine" , Alexey Dokuchaev , Garrett Rooney , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 23 Oct 2000 20:21:39 EDT." References: Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:39:34 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: : On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Brandon D. Valentine wrote: : > Well if you're that stubborn there's no reason that the "new" layout : > could not be compiled into a monolithic script. In fact perhaps you : > could be the one to step forward and write the code to compile that : > script. ;-) : : Indeed, given the slowdowns NetBSD enountered when switching to the new : system due to all of the shell processes being created. which slowdowns were these? Even on older pmax system the boot time wasn't increased too much, once they fixed a couple of bugs in the NetBSD/pmax port... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message